2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (71 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (130 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 21.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |