2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (461 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | SL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 17.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |