2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (188 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-150 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |