2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 25 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1999 Rover 25. (104 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 25.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 25. (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1999 Rover 25 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-150 | 25 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |