2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2000 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | XK |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 75 L |