2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1006 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | E-150 | Minica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2350 mm |
