2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | E-150 | Omega |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 94.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 75 L |