2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (252 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lincoln LS. (362 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | E-150 | LS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 362 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |