2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2002 MG TF | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | E-150 | TF |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
