2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero. (118 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2002 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-150 | Pajero |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |