2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-150 | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 3.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |