2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |