2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Maverick. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2003 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | Maverick |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |