2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar XJ. (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | XJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 85 L |