2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | E-150 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
