2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Kia Optima
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Optima would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (170 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (245 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2004 Kia Optima | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | E-150 | Optima |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |