2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,513 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | SL |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 700 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 91 L |