2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-150 | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |