2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (418 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-150 | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 418 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 54 L |