2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (167 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | C |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |