2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (85 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (130 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | E-150 | Polo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |