2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-150 | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |