2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2009 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2009 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | E-150 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4604 cc | 6199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 19.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |
