2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2009 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | E-150 | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3330 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 127 L |
