2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (311 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-150 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 117 L |