2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 74 L |