2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Yukon (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-150 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1956 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |