2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | E-150 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 40 L |