2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | E-150 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 6290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 4180 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 100 L |
