2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-150 | S60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |