2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1949 Jensen 4-Litre
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jensen 4-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jensen 4-Litre would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1949 Jensen 4-Litre. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jensen 4-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jensen 4-Litre weights approximately 396 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250.
Because 1949 Jensen 4-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jensen 4-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-250 | 1949 Jensen 4-Litre | |
| Make | Ford | Jensen |
| Model | E-250 | 4-Litre |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 6.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 86 L |
