2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-250 | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | E-250 | 92 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |