2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 21 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-250 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | E-250 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |