2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1975 MG MGB
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 MG MGB would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1975 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1975 MG MGB.
Because 1975 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-250 | 1975 MG MGB | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | E-250 | MGB |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |