2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1985 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 364 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1985 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-250 | 1985 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-250 | XJR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 6500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 671 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |