2006 Ford E-250 vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Camry. (106 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Camry weights approximately 286 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Camry. (285 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-250 | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-250 | Camry |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |