2006 Ford E-250 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-250. (226 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 725 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (386 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-250 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | E-250 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4816 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 275 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3380 mm |
