2006 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 428 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 586 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (856 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-250.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford E-250 2013 Ford Mustang
Make Ford Ford
Model E-250 Mustang
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type Van Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 5800 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 225 HP 653 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 388 Nm 856 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 105 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1224 kg 1810 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4778 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 2120 mm 1425 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 13.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 132 L 61 L