2006 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-250 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 29 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-250 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | E-250 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
