2006 Ford E-350 vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1965 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2031 kg more than 1965 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 1965 MG 1100 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | E-350 | 1100 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |