2006 Ford E-350 vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. (434 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | E-350 | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 6555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2750 mm |