2006 Ford E-350 vs. 1980 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1980 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-350 | 1980 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-350 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 5342 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 12 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |
