2006 Ford E-350 vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2006 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2370 mm |