2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1157 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | E-350 | Hac |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |