2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 981 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |