2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 903 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-350 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 87 L |