2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |