2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 Daihatsu Copen
To start off, 2012 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2012 Daihatsu Copen. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Daihatsu Copen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1951 kg more than 2012 Daihatsu Copen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daihatsu Copen. (101 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2012 Daihatsu Copen | |
Make | Ford | Daihatsu |
Model | E-350 | Copen |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 659 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 40 L |