2006 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-350 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1293 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2006 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-350 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | E-350 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |