2006 Ford Escape vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Ford Escape is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Escape (200 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 616 kg more than 2006 Ford Escape.
Because 2006 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Escape | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Escape | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3690 mm |
